While reading Seminar, I learned that 104 Tibetans have self-immolated since 2009 to protest against Chinese oppression and demand free Tibet. I was aware that people are immolating themselves for a free Tibet but the numbers shocked me. This is one of the most horrendous figures of human civilization! It is weird because it is happening in 21^st century and no one notices it. And those who notice ignore it as if nothing major happened.

People have taken another route to protest when other methods failed. When Tibetans protested on roads; they were killed and dumped by the People Liberation Army of China. They did not leave any trace of what happened.    

Where are the United Nations and Human Rights Councils? To my understanding, they are quiet because the big brother (the USA) and European countries are not interested in taking any action because they have business interest in China. 

Why media is not talking about it? Why any Arnab Goswami is not asking ‘nation needs an answer?’ No one, not even journalists, are allowed to enter in Tibet. A couple of CNN and BBC journalists were not allowed to enter Tibet and threatened that if they insist their visas will be cancelled.

Do we lack journalists who can dare and do a sting in Tibet? It is not true. Journalists have reported from troubled areas such as Taliban where the situation was as hostile as it is in Tibet today. It is perhaps media houses are not interested in reporting Tibet issue because it does not make some great news for front pages of newspapers or for prime time on TV.
  

Why is India that has given shelter to the Tibetan ‘parliament-in-exile’ keeping quiet? Indian silence is obvious. Indian government has failed miserably in their foreign policy. It did not act aggressively when Chinese army intruded and setup their camps 19-kilometre inside Indian Territory. So how can they raise voice against the oppression of Tibetans? 

Would India have reacted the same way when human rights of Tamilians were violated in Sri Lanka? No. They told the Sri Lankan premiere to ensure Tamilians are safe and even took up issue on International platforms. India has not done so in the case of Tibet. However, it will face maximum problems by Chinese spoiling Tibetan ecosystem. 

In the times when people resort to violence to demand anything Tibetans sticking to non-violence methods is admirable. If they fail to make a mark, it will be a failure of the principle of non-violence. It is bad sign for a civilized society. Think.

|

Males talk about their sexual desire and fantasies openly. And, no one raises a question. But when people hear females talking about their sexual desires; they looked down upon them. Savita Bhabhi—a pornographic comic character—became instantly popular among Internet generation when it was launched in 2008. A year later, it was banned by the government for serving sexually explicit content.

She was young, sexy, amorous and married. She talked about her sexual desires with men. She demanded whatever she wanted on bed. The comic character may or may not be characterized thinking about what goes on in the minds of Indian women of 21^st century. It made men to rethink about female sexuality and their desires.

The creator may want to utilize male libido and their desire to view and read explicit sexual content to make quick bucks. And, he/she hit the right chord. It was a huge hit and was almost seen by 60 million online users every month. In an interview with an Indian magazine Tehelka, the creators say that their website gets 70 per cent traffic from India.

Savita Bhabhi may have died an early death in the virtual world but she is ready to take rebirth and this time in a new avatar. Internet users can see her in action and talking. An animated porn movie of Savita Bhabhi is available online. 

This time users have to pay $ 25 to see the movie. Porn cartoon videos are popular in other countries but this is the first time someone has come up with porn cartoon in Hindi.

The clear motive of its creators is to make money but they claim they want to talk about freedom of speech and teach men about female sexuality. It is viewers and the government to decide what is the intent of the creators.

|